Information-sharing and aggregation models for interacting minds
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Information-sharing and aggregation models for interacting minds
We study mathematical models of the collaborative solving of a twochoice discrimination task. We estimate the difference between the shared performance for a group of n observers over a single person performance. Our paper is a theoretical extension of the recent work of Bahrami et al. (2010) from a dyad (a pair) to a group of n interacting minds. We analyze several models of communication, dec...
متن کاملAuthorization models for secure information sharing: a survey and research agenda
This article presents a survey of authorization models and considers their 'fitness-for-purpose' in facilitating information sharing. Network-supported information sharing is an important technical capability that underpins collaboration in support of dynamic and unpredictable activities such as emergency response, national security, infrastructure protection, supply chain integration and emerg...
متن کاملInformation-Sharing in Three Interacting Minds Solving a Simple Perceptual Task
We study three-person groups solving a simple, two alternative forced choice task of perceptual nature. The group members provide individual answers and afterwards discuss and reach a joint decision. Different models of information sharing describe the theoretical relationship between group and individual performance. Experimental data shows that average-performing members can benefit from coop...
متن کاملOptimally interacting minds.
In everyday life, many people believe that two heads are better than one. Our ability to solve problems together appears to be fundamental to the current dominance and future survival of the human species. But are two heads really better than one? We addressed this question in the context of a collective low-level perceptual decision-making task. For two observers of nearly equal visual sensiti...
متن کاملGraphical Models for Groups: Belief Aggregation and Risk Sharing
We investigate the use of graphical models in two fundamental problems of group coordination: (1) reaching a consensus on beliefs, and (2) allocating risk. On the negative side, we prove that under mild assumptions, even if every member of a group agrees on a graphical topology, no method of combining their beliefs can maintain that structure. Even weaker conditions rule out local aggregation w...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Mathematical Psychology
سال: 2012
ISSN: 0022-2496
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2013.01.002